NURUL IZZAH TERUS DIBALUN DALAM BAHASA INGGERIS!!!

Manusia jenis tak reti bahasa macam Si Nurul Izzah ni memang tak serik - serik kena balun. Pakai la bahasa apa pun, dia buat - buat tak reti je.

Bukan setakat dia je. Malah semua pemimpin Pakatan Pembangkang tu memang tak reti bahasa. Sama la dengan buat kerja. Satu hapah pun diorang tak reti jugak!!!

Jadi, buat sekian kalinya, orang macam Si Nurul Izzah ni wajib dibalun dalam bahasa Inggeris. Bukan supaya dia faham. Tapi supaya orang luar tau cerita sebenar. Jangan la diorang asyik nak dengar cakap Si Kaki Penipu macam Si Nurul Izzah tu je kerjanya!!!

Our plan was to debunk the alleged Scorpene Scandal step by step, issue by issue and lie by lie. That way,  each aspect of the alleged scandal is addressed and fully understood.

However, the rapid succession of response by their master spinner or easier described as liar, Tian Chua, to dispell Zahid's denial in Parliament, it requires us to ponder on the manner they raised continuos doubt and suspicion.  

Since they are accusing party and responding every answer with accusing questions, the burden of proof should be placed upon them.

For almost a year prior to the leak of the documents last week, SUARAM and PKR politicians have been demanding answers on series of allegations and speculation related to the police investigation. Their motive is  raise doubts and suspicions among the public.

They raised questions in Parliament, demand MACC to investigate, poke on certain personalities to answer them, and one wonder whether demand for anyone to resign have been asked or not. All the poking cannot be entertained or Government will end up playing to their tune.

The Government side have given answers after answers and clarification after clarification but they refuse to accept the answer. 

They want to continue to question and make-up stories as though the answer and clarification is insufficient.  

Since they having the doubt and making allegations, they should be the side to prove without any reasonable doubt? Why the "without any reasonable doubt" condition? - read more...