RECAP: HAKIM AUSSIE TOLAK KELAYAKKAN 'AWANG IMPORT' ANUGAY!!!

Seorang blogger mengatakan bahawa rekod-rekod "kes yang sangat penting" di Australia meninggalkan kredibiliti Dr Brian McDonald "koyak kepada corak-carik".

Hakim dalam kes itu - di mana bukti DNA telah digunakan untuk cuba untuk menentukan bapa kanak-kanak - dipetik oleh penulis blog PantaiReporter sebagai berkata, 

"Pada akhir Dr McDonald bukti utama, saya tidak tahu dari siapa atau dari mana Dr McDonald memperolehi kepakaran yang dituntut di dalam DNA dan genetik molekul . "

Blogger tersebut juga menulis, "Dalam perenggan yang berikut hakim pergi untuk membedah pelbagai kelayakan bahawa McDonald telah dikemukakan kepada mahkamah untuk menyokong keterangan pakar dan membuat kesimpulan bahawa dia sebenarnya tidak layak untuk menjadi seorang pakar."

Berikut tulisan mengenai artikel tersebut dalam bahasa Inggeris:

Anwar’s DNA expert suffers from CSI effect? CSI effect is where non experts feel they are expert on the basis of peripheral knowledge derived from a television series.

It seems that the defence’s DNA expert witness, Brian McDonald is not such an authority on the subject as he may have portrayed himself to be.

This is not the opinion of this author or anyone in Malaysia but the findings of four Australian judges in a landmark DNA statistic case R v Bropho.

In the Bropho case the court had to solely on DNA results and DNA statistics to determine the paternity of a child, Brian Mc Donald’s expert evidence was excluded by the court. The judge, Goetze, DCJ in paragraph 45 said:

“At the end of Dr McDonald’s evidence-in-chief, I did not know from who or from where Dr McDonald obtained his claimed expertise in DNA and molecular genetics. I still don’t know what it is that Dr McDonald knows or does not know about DNA and genetics, and importantly, about population statistics, which his regarded as a “rather esoteric little classification” (T203)”

By the way T203 refers to the paragraph in the court transcript where Dr McDonald made his remark about esoteric little classification.

Earlier in paragraph 42, the judge already hinted at his doubts in McDonald’s credibility, he said: “That Dr McDonald could explain the terms does not make him an expert”

Further down in the written judgment, the judge explains that he is not alone in questioning McDonald’s qualification and expertise as the doctor himself had made it clear he does not have expertise in the subject he gave testimony in.

Sambungannya, korang boleh klik kat sini.

Dalam ertikata mudahnya, Dr. Brain McDonald iaitu 'Pakar DNA' yang diimport oleh Si Ketua Penipu ni bukan seorang Pakar pun sebenarnya. Tetapi dia seorang Perunding.

Dan, dalam masa yang sama, Hakim di Australia pun turut mengatakan bahawa Si Brain ni tidak ada kelayakan dalam perihal DNA dan Genetik seperti yang didakwa oleh dia sebelum ini.

Jadi, takkan la pihak Mahkamah di Malaysia ni masih nak menjadikan keterangan daripada seorang yang tidak mempunyai kelayakan seperti 'Awang Import' Anugay ni?

Yang paling utama sekali, adakah Si Ketua Penipu tu dapat menerima kenyataan bahawa dia dah tersalah pilih orang untuk membela dia dalam kes ni?

Mungkin inilah akibatnya bila dia suka sangat menipu sana sini. Suruh buat kerja senang tak nak. Nak jugak buat kerja susah. Sekarang, Baru Padan Muka Dia!!!